The International Cricket Council (ICC) has slammed the pitch used for the third Test between India and Australia in Indore, rating it as ‘poor’. The match ended within three days, with India winning by eight wickets.
The ICC said in a statement that the pitch was “not up to the required standard” and that it “did not allow an even contest between bat and ball”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”.
The ICC also said that the pitch “did not provide a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of the batsmen”. The statement added that the pitch “did not allow for a fair contest between bat and ball” and that “the balance between bat and ball was heavily skewed in favour of
