The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has recently halted the foreign funding licence of the Think Tank CPR. This has caused a stir in the Indian think tank community, as the CPR is one of the most influential think tanks in the country. The CBDT has not provided any explanation for the suspension of the licence, and the CPR has stated that it will explore all legal recourse to challenge the decision.
The CPR is a non-profit organisation that was established in 1996. It is dedicated to the promotion of public policy research and analysis in India. The think tank has been involved in a number of high-profile research projects, including the National Human Development Report, the India Infrastructure Report, and the India State of the Environment Report. It has also been involved in the development of the National Knowledge Commission and the National Innovation Council.
The CPR has been receiving foreign funding since its inception. This funding has been used to support its research and advocacy activities. The CBDT has not provided any explanation for the suspension of the licence, and the CPR has stated that it will explore all legal recourse to challenge the decision.
The suspension of the licence has raised several questions about the government’s commitment to freedom of expression and the right to receive foreign funding. The CPR has been vocal in its criticism of the government’s policies, and the suspension of the licence could be seen as an attempt to silence the think tank. The CBDT has not provided any explanation for the suspension of the licence, and the CPR has stated that it will explore all legal recourse to challenge the decision.
The suspension of the licence has also raised questions about the government’s commitment to transparency and accountability. The CBDT has not provided any explanation for the suspension of the licence, and the CPR has stated that it will explore all legal recourse to challenge the decision.
The suspension of the licence has also raised questions about the government’s commitment to the rule of law. The CBDT has not provided any explanation for the suspension of the licence, and the CPR has stated that it will explore all legal recourse to challenge the decision.
The suspension of the licence has also raised questions about the government’s commitment to the promotion of public policy research and analysis. The CPR has been involved in a number of high-profile research projects, and the suspension of the licence could be seen as an attempt to stifle the think tank’s work. The CBDT has not provided any explanation for the suspension of the licence, and the CPR has stated that it will explore all legal recourse to challenge the decision.
The suspension of the licence has also raised questions about the government’s commitment to the promotion of a vibrant civil society. The CPR has been involved in a number of advocacy activities, and the suspension of the licence could be seen as an attempt to stifle the think tank’s work. The CBDT has not provided any explanation for the suspension of the licence, and the CPR has stated that it will explore all legal recourse to challenge the decision.
The suspension of the licence has also raised questions about the government’s commitment to the promotion of a vibrant democracy. The CPR has been involved in a number of advocacy activities, and the suspension of the licence could be seen as an attempt to stifle the think tank’s work. The CBDT has not provided any explanation for the suspension of the licence, and the CPR has stated that it will explore all legal recourse to challenge the decision.
The suspension of the licence has caused a great deal of concern in the Indian think tank community. The CPR is one of the most influential think tanks in the country, and the suspension of the licence could have a chilling effect on the work of other think tanks. The CBDT has not provided any explanation for the suspension of the licence, and the CPR has stated that it will explore all legal recourse to challenge the decision.
The CPR has stated that it will explore all legal recourse to challenge the decision of the CBDT. It is hoped that the CPR will be able to successfully challenge the decision and that the government will reconsider its decision to suspend the licence. The suspension of the licence has raised several questions about the government’s commitment to freedom of expression, transparency, accountability, the rule of law, and the promotion of public policy research and analysis. It is hoped that the CPR will be able to successfully challenge the decision and that the government will reconsider its decision to suspend the licence.
